Notice: This is not a City of Long Beach site.
Dear Readers: Please note that this is not a City of Long Beach website and is not paid for nor maintained by taxpayer funds.
If you contact Gerrie Schipske through this site on any matter pertaining to the City of Long Beach, a copy of your contact will be forwarded to her official city email as an official public record.
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Come where few in Long Beach have ever gone
You are invited to come behind the scenes with me on Jan 11 to see how Long Beach converts your trash into electricity.
Click here to sign up for this Open Up Long Beach event.
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Council Approves Look at Impact on Police -- Crimes Soar to 854 in Last 30 Days
The City Council unanimously approved having the City Manager report to the Council in January on the impact that the FY 2013 budget has had on such departments as Police.
And it couldn't come soon enough. Residents are constantly reporting crimes in their neighborhoods. Although the Mayor insists Long Beach is "safe" I challenge him to review the following stats on Crimereports.com (that are reported by the LB Police Department). These stats show the number of serious crimes by zip codes: (robbery, burglary, car theft, theft from vehicles, shootings)
90801 - 263 crimes
90803 - 42 crimes
90804 - 50 crimes
90805 - 91 crimes
90806 - 109 crimes
90807 - 96 crimes
90808 - 60 crimes
90815 - 62 crimes
90814 - 132 crimes
Residential crimes are increasing. We need more police resources.
I asked the City Attorney if I could make a motion to reallocate funds ($500,000 for a consultant) to the Police and he indicated because we were asking for a report, it would not be appropriate. I will do so when the report comes back to the Council.
And it couldn't come soon enough. Residents are constantly reporting crimes in their neighborhoods. Although the Mayor insists Long Beach is "safe" I challenge him to review the following stats on Crimereports.com (that are reported by the LB Police Department). These stats show the number of serious crimes by zip codes: (robbery, burglary, car theft, theft from vehicles, shootings)
90801 - 263 crimes
90803 - 42 crimes
90804 - 50 crimes
90805 - 91 crimes
90806 - 109 crimes
90807 - 96 crimes
90808 - 60 crimes
90815 - 62 crimes
90814 - 132 crimes
Residential crimes are increasing. We need more police resources.
I asked the City Attorney if I could make a motion to reallocate funds ($500,000 for a consultant) to the Police and he indicated because we were asking for a report, it would not be appropriate. I will do so when the report comes back to the Council.
Sunday, December 9, 2012
Schipske Asks for Report on Odor
![]() |
Oil island (Photo credit: theqspeaks) |
Well, they did it again. Someone or something let off a smell last week that fluctuates between rotten eggs and burning oil. No one quite explains who really is doing it and why. But it seems to happen frequently when it just rains or is overcast and I can smell it at Studebaker and Spring.
So I am asking for an official report from city management on what this is and who is doing it and whether or not it is harmful.
Here's my agenda item:
Discussion:
Periodically, especially
when it is overcast or has just rained, there will be a strong, noxious odor
with a smell that is described as natural gas, rotten egg or oil burning. When
residents on the east side of Long Beach call 9-1-1 they are told a number of
things concerning the source of the odor: “It’s AES burning off oil; it’s the
oil operations at the oil islands burning off oil or it’s an oil tanker burning
off its fuel in the harbor.”
It would be helpful if: a)
the source of the smell could be confirmed; b) an assessment could be done to
determine if the odor is harmful and 3) the reverse 9-1-1 be used whenever the
odor occurs to alert residents that it is not harmful.
Recommendation:
By
motion of the City Council, request a report from the Fire Department, Gas and
Oil Properties and the AQMD regarding the source of this odor and confirmation
that the odor is not harmful. Additionally, request that the reverse 9-1-1
system be used to alert residents on the eastside of the City whenever the odor
occurs.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Schipske to Propose Shifting Consultant Money to Hiring Police -- Appoint a Citizen Blue Ribbon Panel to Serve as Consultants
![]() |
Long Beach Police Department (California) (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Schipske to Propose
Using the $500,000 Approved by Council for Consultants to Restore Cuts in Police Services– Says Mayor
Should Appoint a Citizen Blue Ribbon Panel to Serve as Consultants to City Management
December 8, 2012
Long Beach, CA – Just one week after the City Council on a
5-4 vote approved spending up to $500,000 to retain Management Partners, a
Cincinnati, Ohio based consulting group to advise on governmental reform, Councilwoman
Gerrie Schipske announced that she will make a motion during Council on Tuesday
to redirect the $500,000 to the Police department in order to “restore some of
the cuts that were made to the department this budget cycle.”
“Every area of the City of Long Beach is experiencing a
severe increase in crime,” says Schipske who placed an item on this coming Tuesday
Council agenda, asking for an update on police response times.
“I placed the item concerning the Police response times
because of the numerous complaints I received from residents who are concerned
about the increases in crime. My constituents are having their homes and cars
broken into constantly and are being told that due to budget cuts there are not
enough police. I don’t know how anyone on the council can tell our residents
that we need consultants when we don’t have enough police.”
Schipske also will propose that instead of hiring out of
town consultants to review the City of Long Beach, that the Mayor should
appoint a “Blue Ribbon Citizen Panel” and let them advise on how to improve
City management.
“This City has 450,000 people and among them are many
talented people who know a thing or two about how to make organizations run
better. Many of those people actually work for the City of Long Beach or are in
the private sector that does business with the City. We also have expert faculty
at our major university and community college so I am confident we can fill a ‘Blue
Ribbon Citizen Panel’ quickly and without spending $500,000.”
#30
Friday, December 7, 2012
What Council Did Last Tuesday
There they go again...spending money we don't have and without even getting the details.
|
|
Two Really Bad Ideas on Council Agenda Tonight
Two very bad proposals were placed on the
agenda that spend money we really don't have and gave authority to the
City Manager to spend up to $250,000 without City Council approval.
Earlier this year, City Management hired a consultant, Management Partners, who took exactly one month while we were debating the budget, and were asked to come up with a list of issues that they feel needed to be changed.
One month is nothing to determine what a city needs and the consultants admitted they didn't really know Long Beach. The City spent $80,000 for the one month report and today on a 5-4 vote the council approved an additional $500,000 for a study that had no parameters. (By the way, City Management did not even go out for a bid to see if other consultants could perform this work for less.)
No specifics or details were given to the City Council as to what the consultants would do for $500,000 -- no proposal, no indication of the numbers of hours they would work or when we would see their work. Nothing.
When I asked if the Council would be given the contract to review, the City Manager responded "no." So I voted against the expenditure. I will be damned if I will asked to approved spending $500,000 and I can't see the contract.
What was also very troubling was the fact that as I sat in Council I went on line and found several proposals given by the same consultant to other cities with specifics as to hours, the scope of work and the timeline for completion. But somehow, the City Council in Long Beach could not be given the same information.
Oh, here's the part you will really find interesting. Councilman DeLong spoke and stated: "Isn't it true that Management Partners said it could save the City $28.8 million with their ideas?" Oh, my "yes" was the response and the $500,000 proposal was agreed to on a 5-4 vote. Really? We don't even know what they are going to do for the $500,000 but we know they can save the City $28.8 million? Why not $50 million? Why not $10 million? Amazing because Management Partners didn't promise the other cities it did reports for it could save them that kind of money.
The other motion was to increase the authority of the City Manager to make purchases up to $250,000 without City Council approval. The item was amended to $200,000 but I voted against this bad idea that raised his authority from $100,000.
In this economic situation it is fiscally unwise for a City Council to give authority to spend this level of money without oversight. I asked if any other City in California allowed their City Manager authority up to $200,000 or $250,000 and the answer was "no." I guess we're special. No information on how we are spending money and now we've upped what can be spent without our approval.
I did speak out on both of these bad ideas and pointed out that my constituents have asked repeatedly why in a City this size with the number of managers we have, we continue to hire outside consultants. By increasing the amount the City Manager can spend without our approval he can continue hiring more and more consultants.
Sometimes I think we have gone mad in this City. We don't have enough funds for police and fire, library and parks but yet we can spend $500,000 on consultants. (And almost $1 million on a tunnel design that went nowhere.) Reminds me of the story: The Emperor Has No Clothes -- everyone was so afraid of the emperor that they dare not tell him he was naked. They ooooed and ahhhed and said what a "fine garment you are wearing" instead of stepping up and telling the truth.
Let me know how you feel about these two items by emailing me at: district5@longbeach.gov.
Earlier this year, City Management hired a consultant, Management Partners, who took exactly one month while we were debating the budget, and were asked to come up with a list of issues that they feel needed to be changed.
One month is nothing to determine what a city needs and the consultants admitted they didn't really know Long Beach. The City spent $80,000 for the one month report and today on a 5-4 vote the council approved an additional $500,000 for a study that had no parameters. (By the way, City Management did not even go out for a bid to see if other consultants could perform this work for less.)
No specifics or details were given to the City Council as to what the consultants would do for $500,000 -- no proposal, no indication of the numbers of hours they would work or when we would see their work. Nothing.
When I asked if the Council would be given the contract to review, the City Manager responded "no." So I voted against the expenditure. I will be damned if I will asked to approved spending $500,000 and I can't see the contract.
What was also very troubling was the fact that as I sat in Council I went on line and found several proposals given by the same consultant to other cities with specifics as to hours, the scope of work and the timeline for completion. But somehow, the City Council in Long Beach could not be given the same information.
Oh, here's the part you will really find interesting. Councilman DeLong spoke and stated: "Isn't it true that Management Partners said it could save the City $28.8 million with their ideas?" Oh, my "yes" was the response and the $500,000 proposal was agreed to on a 5-4 vote. Really? We don't even know what they are going to do for the $500,000 but we know they can save the City $28.8 million? Why not $50 million? Why not $10 million? Amazing because Management Partners didn't promise the other cities it did reports for it could save them that kind of money.
The other motion was to increase the authority of the City Manager to make purchases up to $250,000 without City Council approval. The item was amended to $200,000 but I voted against this bad idea that raised his authority from $100,000.
In this economic situation it is fiscally unwise for a City Council to give authority to spend this level of money without oversight. I asked if any other City in California allowed their City Manager authority up to $200,000 or $250,000 and the answer was "no." I guess we're special. No information on how we are spending money and now we've upped what can be spent without our approval.
I did speak out on both of these bad ideas and pointed out that my constituents have asked repeatedly why in a City this size with the number of managers we have, we continue to hire outside consultants. By increasing the amount the City Manager can spend without our approval he can continue hiring more and more consultants.
Sometimes I think we have gone mad in this City. We don't have enough funds for police and fire, library and parks but yet we can spend $500,000 on consultants. (And almost $1 million on a tunnel design that went nowhere.) Reminds me of the story: The Emperor Has No Clothes -- everyone was so afraid of the emperor that they dare not tell him he was naked. They ooooed and ahhhed and said what a "fine garment you are wearing" instead of stepping up and telling the truth.
Let me know how you feel about these two items by emailing me at: district5@longbeach.gov.
Sincerely,
Gerrie
Gerrie Schipske
P.S.
I learned that the City spent almost $1 million dollars on a study and
design for a tunnel that will not be built between the Police
Department and the new courthouse.
Tuesday, December 4, 2012
Two Bad Ideas Brought to City Council
Two very wrong proposals were placed on the agenda that spend money we really don't have and to give authority to the City Manager to spend up to $250,000 without City Council approval.
City Management hired a consultant Management Partners who took exactly one month while we were debating the budget to come up with a list of issues that they feel needed to be changed. One month is nothing to determine what a city needs. The City spent $80,000 for the one month report and today on a 5-4 vote the council approved an additional $500,000 for a study that had no parameters.When I asked if the Council would be given the contract to review, the City Manager responded "no." So I voted against the expenditure. I will be damned if I will asked to approved spending $500,000 and I can't see the contract.
The other motion was to increase the authority of the City Manager to make purchases up to $200,000 without City Council approval. In this economic situation it is fiscally unwise for a City Council to give authority to spend this level of money without oversight. I asked if any other City in California allowed their City Manager authority up to $250,000 and the answer was "no."
City Management hired a consultant Management Partners who took exactly one month while we were debating the budget to come up with a list of issues that they feel needed to be changed. One month is nothing to determine what a city needs. The City spent $80,000 for the one month report and today on a 5-4 vote the council approved an additional $500,000 for a study that had no parameters.When I asked if the Council would be given the contract to review, the City Manager responded "no." So I voted against the expenditure. I will be damned if I will asked to approved spending $500,000 and I can't see the contract.
The other motion was to increase the authority of the City Manager to make purchases up to $200,000 without City Council approval. In this economic situation it is fiscally unwise for a City Council to give authority to spend this level of money without oversight. I asked if any other City in California allowed their City Manager authority up to $250,000 and the answer was "no."
Take a Survey on Chickens, and Goats and Bees...oh my!
Click on my survey to assess the opinion of residents concerning whether or not the City should adopt an ordinance that would allow chickens, goats and bees to be maintained in your backyards.
http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07e6pt8fj2ha5ik54q/start
Also check out the City's Office of Sustainability information on "Urban Agriculture" : http://www.longbeach.gov/citymanager/sustainability/urban_nature/urban_agriculture/default.asp
http://survey.constantcontact.com/survey/a07e6pt8fj2ha5ik54q/start
Also check out the City's Office of Sustainability information on "Urban Agriculture" : http://www.longbeach.gov/citymanager/sustainability/urban_nature/urban_agriculture/default.asp
Friday, November 30, 2012
Sidewalks to be repaired in FY 2013
The 5th Council District has the most sidewalks of all the council districts because we have the most area due to the fact we are spread out with single family homes. Other districts are compact with apartments and condos.
Historically each council district was given the same amount of funds for sidewalk repairs even if they had the most need. I advocated for a change in that policy and now the 5th District receives the most for sidewalk repairs because we have the most needing repair.
Additionally, since taking office in 2006, I insisted that sidewalk repairs be bunched together by neighborhood instead of a shot gun approach of one here and several there. I am proud to announce that the Public Works department has adopted my system city wide. This will allow more sidewalks to be repaired each year.
Below is the latest report on the sidewalks to be repaired this budget year. Following the memo is a map showing where repairs have been made: FY 2013 Sidewalk Repairs Scheduled for district 5 Map of sidewalk repairs made in the 5th district
Historically each council district was given the same amount of funds for sidewalk repairs even if they had the most need. I advocated for a change in that policy and now the 5th District receives the most for sidewalk repairs because we have the most needing repair.
Additionally, since taking office in 2006, I insisted that sidewalk repairs be bunched together by neighborhood instead of a shot gun approach of one here and several there. I am proud to announce that the Public Works department has adopted my system city wide. This will allow more sidewalks to be repaired each year.
Below is the latest report on the sidewalks to be repaired this budget year. Following the memo is a map showing where repairs have been made: FY 2013 Sidewalk Repairs Scheduled for district 5 Map of sidewalk repairs made in the 5th district
Schipske Asks Chief of Police for Public Report
Schipske Asks Chief of
Police to Publicly Report How Much Additional Funds Needed for Police
Department – Says “constituents complaining of being told by Police ‘not enough resources’”
Long Beach, CA -- November 30, 2012 – Vice Chair of the City’s
Public Safety Committee, Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske, today submitted an
agenda item which asks the Chief of Police to publicly “report on the impact of the current budget (FY 2013) on response times
of the department and to identify what additional funding is needed so that
residents are assured that the police have appropriate resources.”
The agenda item
comes as a result of Councilwoman Schipske learning during a recent council
meeting that the Police Department needs an additional $1.5 million just to
cover its overtime costs for this budget year “and an increase in the number of
residential crimes in the 5th District coupled with numerous
complaints from 5th District residents that they are being told by
police that the police don’t have enough resources,” explains Schipske.
“Just recently, the City Council transferred monies which
were designated for shot identification technology for use by the Police Department
for overtime. When I asked the Chief what additional monies were needed to meet
overtime needs of the Department, she was told in Council by the Chief that the
Department needs $1.5 million,” says Schipske pointing out that FY 2013 Budget
proposals for the Police Department were submitted to the Council by the City
Manager and the Mayor. “At no time was the Council told by either party that
current budget levels would be insufficient to maintain an adequate police
presence in the City or at a level that officers in the field would need to
inform residents that they lack sufficient resources.”
Schipske also recently asked the Fire Department to
report on the impact of the budget on its responses times after hearing reports
from firefighters how difficult it is to respond to calls for services with
less staff and less equipment.
“Neither of these situations is acceptable. The City
Council needs to hear in a public session what additional funds are needed now
to keep this city safe.”
Schipske indicates that funding may be available from the
increases in both property and sales tax revenue the city is experiencing due
to an improving economy. “The recent court ruling that the County of Los
Angeles owes the city money should also be considered a source for public
safety. Additionally, as the city sells off properties that were once owned by
Redevelopment, we need to designate the revenue from the sales for public
safety.”
#30
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Reel Recycling Signs Up
![]() |
Fishing Line Recycling (Photo credit: ecotist) |
More importantly, the debris does wind up in the water or wrapped around a bird.
This week, we have added signs that remind anglers to place their excess line and tackle into the tubes. (Tubes? Yes. This prevents children and critters from getting into the recycled material.)
I want to thank my task force on Lakes, Ponds and Wetlands for its work on this effort and for the great staff in Parks, Recreation and Marine for putting the tubes and signs in all the best spots.
Friday, November 23, 2012
Regulating Placement of Cellphone Towers Is Hampered by Law
![]() |
Angel with mobile phone (Photo credit: Akbar Sim) |
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Come to Costco on Saturday for my booksigning
If you are out shopping this Saturday, November 24th, come on by Costco in Signal Hill for my booksigning of my third book: Early Long Beach.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
5th District Challenges City on Christmas Light Contest
![]() |
Christmas light 1, Embassy Theatre and Indiana Hotel (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
The contest starts November 26th and the winner can receive $500 to pay their electric bill and $100,000 for their local schools.
Belmont Shore Patch will post videos and photographs of homes decorated in Christmas light.
If you all send your video and photograph I will post in on www.district5lights.com and then send it along to Belmont Shore Patch for entry in their contest.
Come on 5th District. You know we can do this.
Friday, November 16, 2012
Long Beach New York Needs Our Help!!
For Immediate Release
Contact: Tiffany
Andrews, 562 570-6932
Long Beach, New York Needs
Your Help to Recover
Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske Calls Upon Residents to Lend a Hand or a
Dollar or Two
Long Beach, CA; November 16, 2012 -- Next week is
Thanksgiving and for the 37,000 residents of the city of Long Beach, New York it will be grim day as all days have been since
they were devastated during Hurricane Sandy says Gerrie Schipske, Councilwoman
for the 5th Council District in Long Beach, California.
“I had my staff contact city management in Long Beach, New
York to find out why we could do,” explains Schipske. “A spokesperson for the
city told my staff they are a small town (37,000
residents) and most homes have lost their first floor. They are gutting homes
and leaving debris on the street. They need the assistance of volunteers and
neighboring municipalities to deal with the clean up. They are unable to accept
clothing and household item donations. They need financial assistance - they were in a declared fiscal crisis before
the storm hit.”
Schipske reminds
local residents that “we are so fortunate here in Long Beach, California. Take
a moment to see the video (http://youtu.be/sgkVdnxyGDk)
on the damage to Long Beach, New York
and send a financial donation at: www.longbeachny.org or send to: City of Long Beach
Relief,1 West Chester Street, Long Beach, NY11561.
“Let’s show them what Long Beach, California is all about!”
#30
Related articles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Save Station 18
Popular Posts
-
Just received this briefing: White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs Local Update Welcome to the White House Office of Intergove...
-
The City announced that owners of Smart phones can download an application that allows you to text in any problems you encounter in the city...
-
Glad that my colleague Robert Garcia agreed to my suggestion that the proposal to require benefits for the domestic partners of employees em...
-
Long Beach, CA – February 9, 2013 – The annual Long Beach Solar Grand Prix competition which challenges students to work as a team,...
-
Schipske to Address LBCC Board Regarding Continuing Problems of Student Parking in Neighborhoods – Feels LBCC Should Pay for Residents’ ...
-
Giving Thanks (Photo credit: mRio ) Dear Friend, I just wanted to say thanks. As I wrapped up my Council work for this week a...
-
City council passed my agenda item in February directing the City Manager to apply for federal designation as a potential manufacturing ar...
-
Tonight the City Council will decide whether or not to approved the 2nd and PCH project -- you know, the one that promises to obliterate the...
-
The 1st Annual Solar Grand Prix held last Saturday, April 10 was a winner and is receiving some very positive press locally and in the ...
-
Schipske Calls on Council to Examine City’s Investments in Financial Entities That Are Foreclosing on Long Beach Homes and Are Facing Feder...