So glad to learn that since my colleagues rejected a lobbyist ordinance a year ago -- saying it was not needed -- (instead of it being fatally flawed like some are posturing about now) --that they are working on their own.
All of the work was done in the Elections Oversight Committee -- a matrix showing all other big cities and what they do. We reviewed all the other cities language and gave that report to the full city council which rejected all of it on a 7-2 vote.
So back to the drawing board.
It isn't just an ordinance that is needed -- it is a new attitude that sets the bar high for public officials and key department heads -- instead of WWJD (what would Jesus do) -- it should be -- WWLBTT? What Would Long Beach Taxpayers Think?
What would they think when an elected official takes a gift from someone doing business with the city?
What would they think when a department head travels with a paid lobbyist and that lobbyist then gives direction to city staff on what he wants done?
What would they think when an elected or city staff gets wined and dined by developers?
From the hundreds of responses I have received from taxpayers -- they are livid and assumed that Long Beach already had in place clear guidelines so that everyone inside City Hall knew what was appropriate and not.
So we don't need just a lobbyist ordinance -- we need a new attitude that respects the taxpayers of the City who pay our salaries.
P.S. We also need an ordinance that prohibits any elected official or department head or city manager or Planning or Harbor Commissioner from leaving service with the City of Long Beach and then representing anyone doing business with the City of Long Beach for a period of 3 years! No more revolving doors.
Notice: This is not a City of Long Beach site.
Dear Readers: Please note that this is not a City of Long Beach website and is not paid for nor maintained by taxpayer funds.
If you contact Gerrie Schipske through this site on any matter pertaining to the City of Long Beach, a copy of your contact will be forwarded to her official city email as an official public record.
Save Station 18
Popular Posts
-
Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske today expressed her concern upon learning that the company used by the City of Long Beach to send out the notic...
-
See below for the announcement that pursuant to the City Charter, elected official salaries are raised 1.3% which is the Consumer Price Inde...
-
Having just gone behind the scenes with Long Beach residents at the Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (SERRF), a recycling and s...
-
Don't know about you. But I am running into more and more people lately with seriously allergies and coughs. People are complaining abou...
-
The City Council agreed with my request that we require that medical marijuana collectives not be allowed closer than 1,000 feet from all el...
-
Tonight the City Council will decide whether or not to approved the 2nd and PCH project -- you know, the one that promises to obliterate the...
-
I am receiving results from the survey I posted regarding the City Council voting to approve expending $4million in Tidelands funds for a st...
-
As I indicated in my previous blog, City management has just sent out a Request for Qualifications to find a developer who might be interest...
-
2 (Photo credit: stevelyon ) Schipske to Ask For Report on Newest Revenue Source for Fire Department : AB 678 -- New law provide...
-
English: Four BSNF units (a GE C44-9W is leading) with a double-stack train descending Tehachapi Pass, between Caliente and Bakersfield, C...
