The fun phrases being thrown around: "union lackey, in the pocket of the unions, union slave..." That's how some people are describing the Mayor and City Council.
I understand that these same people don't like the Mayor and Council's support of collective bargaining or the pension levels that the city is currently obligated to pay (and which need to be addressed by both state and local levels). But name calling doesn't elevate the discussion.
Now the latest I have heard is that the only reason I support using Schroeder Army Hall for a police substation is because the police union wants it.(They omitted the 7 other council members who voted for it as well.)
Really? My understanding is that when this issue was first raised, the Councilman from the 4th District stated that the POA didn't want the east station to move out of the 4th Council district and that they wanted a substation in the 4th and not in the 5th (which is just actually blocks away).
At no time have I ever talked with the police union about Schroeder Hall. Ever.
The proposal to use that surplus army property as a police substation was made by a citizen's committee which approved the city's application for that use. (The committee approved that use instead of the other applications which also included transitional housing units.)
That property -- which is in great condition -- will save the City of Long Beach millions of dollars because of the value of the land and the fact that the buildings do not need to be demolished. The current police substation next to Krispy Kreme is bursting at the seams and is costing the city thousands in rent.
And yes, the 800 pound gorilla is still in the room -- accepting the property from the army requires that the city accommodate the homeless -- which the city is still working on in order to minimize impacts on the surrounding community.
I don't know if people notice my votes on the council. But I am in no one's pocket except the people who elected me.
Notice: This is not a City of Long Beach site.
Dear Readers: Please note that this is not a City of Long Beach website and is not paid for nor maintained by taxpayer funds.
If you contact Gerrie Schipske through this site on any matter pertaining to the City of Long Beach, a copy of your contact will be forwarded to her official city email as an official public record.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Save Station 18
Popular Posts
-
Friday Newsletter Final
-
Developing story...in my quest to find out why anyone would design a courthouse, win the bid but not include an important element in the d...
-
City council passed my agenda item in February directing the City Manager to apply for federal designation as a potential manufacturing ar...
-
Thanks so much to all the readers who contacted the Long Beach Chamber of Commerce, urging them to help recruit Tesla Motors to Long Beach. ...
-
Bembridge House in Long Beach January 24, 2014 – Hoping to bring a tax savings in Long Beach to those who own historical properties, ...
-
I have been pushing to open up the collective bargaining process in Long Beach for several years but found little interest on the City Counc...
-
Sorry to say that the Long Beach Unified School District could not find anyone to attend the community meeting held last night to discuss th...
-
978 people have responded to the survey on placement of medical marijuana collectives. Of these, 471 have indicated they are residents of th...
-
Government transparency is the cornerstone of democracy. As such, it is our collective responsibility to protect our right to a governm...
-
Write text here... Related articles Schipske Launches NEXTDOOR -- a Social Network for 5th District Residents Nextdoor.com Brings Social ...