I previously posted both here and on Facebook that too much money was given to council members from those who had interests in medical marijuana collectives being scheduled to be closed because of a recent court decision.
Precisely, $9,100 was given for council and congressional campaigns underway. No one disclosed during the council meeting that they had accepted the money. I think they should have.
So when that tidbit of truth hit the air...someone posted several times on Facebook and on the Press Telegram that I had accepted $600,000. Wowee is that a whopping lie. I spent the large sum of $69,000 on my first council campaign and $20, 596 on my 2010 campaign.
Folks, not only did I not accept a penny from anyone connected with the marijuana business, but since being on city council I have raised only @ $64,000, qualified for candidate matching funds in the amount of @$7,000 and loaned my committee @$17,000. Do the math. That is nowhere near $600k.
Here is the link to my campaign contributors so you can see the truth.
So why the distortion of facts? I can only guess that this supporter of medical marijuana thought she needed to smear me because she and her friends are very angry that the council listened to the advice of our City Attorney and passed a ban on these collectives. I received a handful of angry emails yesterday and today telling me so.
Why are they so mad at me when the vote was 8-1? Because I have been upfront from the beginning that I am not in favor of these collectives but I did vote in support of the city's efforts to try to work within the Compassionate Use Act and allow reasonable access. Then the Court of Appeal said "No" to the City and I voted with 7 other "supporters" of the collectives to ban them in 6 months.
We can argue all day about whether or not marijuana should be legal. It is not legal and only the federal government can change that.
We can also debate -- and the City Council did so extensively -- about whether or not Long Beach should ignore the court ruling in the Pack case which stated that the city could not regulate marijuana collectives because they were illegal. If the city can't regulate we could not stop them from opening in any neighborhood.
And that folks, is the truth.
Notice: This is not a City of Long Beach site.
Dear Readers: Please note that this is not a City of Long Beach website and is not paid for nor maintained by taxpayer funds.
If you contact Gerrie Schipske through this site on any matter pertaining to the City of Long Beach, a copy of your contact will be forwarded to her official city email as an official public record.
Save Station 18
Popular Posts
-
Long Beach Police Department (California) (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) 12/12/2013 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PRESS RELEASE #2012 Subje...
-
NEWS RELEASE CONTACT: Tiffany Andrews, 570-6932 Councilwoman Gerrie Schipske Pursues Approval to Dedicate Building to Euni...
-
I am sure you agree that Long Beach needs jobs! That's why I am asking my colleagues on the City Council to approve two measures I hav...
-
It was my distinct honor to welcome home the men and women from the 1498th Transportation Company as they came off the airplane at Long Beac...
-
Today at its quarterly meeting in Sacramento, I was elected by the other members of the California Medical Board to serve as Secretary of th...
-
Says Pension System Making Billions of Investments in Other Cities and Countries to Create Jobs and Housing Long Beach, CA – March 11, 201...
-
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of Communications FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 22, 2013 White House Highlights Gerrie Schipske as an O...
-
What do DeMille Middle School and Hawaiian Gardens have in common? Answer: government entities going forward without consulting the neighbor...
-
Sorry to say that the Long Beach Unified School District could not find anyone to attend the community meeting held last night to discuss th...
-
Government transparency is the cornerstone of democracy. As such, it is our collective responsibility to protect our right to a governm...
