What has gotten into the water in Long Beach lately? Or better yet, what are people smoking? (Don't ask...)
First the council moves to allow "cigar lounges" and then it speeds along to gut most of the proposed restrictions on marijuana collectives.
What is galling is that allowing the cigar lounges flies in the face of not only the City's protective, comprehensive policy for no smoking in public places and workplaces (which was affirmed by a public vote of the citizens), but is absolutely contrary to the City of Long Beach's Public Health Department's core mission of "promoting and protecting public health."
You can read the complete memo I requested during Council from our City Public Health Officer at the right of this post. The report by the way that is required in the City's current no smoking ordinance.
Now on to the proposed ordinance to regulate marijuana collectives in Long Beach. On the floor last Tuesday, many changes were proposed to be made to what City Attorney Bob Shannon wrote. I made a motion to slow the train down a little by bringing the proposals back to council next week as a draft and not as a first reading of a done deal ordinance.
I am concerned that many of the changes severely weaken the city's ability to regulate these operations and am especially concerned that they might be able to operate near libraries and parks and in mixed zoned areas that have both residential and commercial.
I proposed and hopefully it will be in the draft that any residence within 1,000 feet will have to receive notice of these collectives applying for a permit to operate.
Residents should be asking who is getting campaign contributions from these two entities -- cigar lounges and marijuana collectives -- before a final vote is taken. Also, how on earth can our local news outlets (sans www.lbreport.com) be considered "objective reporters" when they are taking thousands of dollars in advertising. I doubt they are going to "bite the hand that feeds them" by taking a position for strict regulation.
Notice: This is not a City of Long Beach site.
Dear Readers: Please note that this is not a City of Long Beach website and is not paid for nor maintained by taxpayer funds.
If you contact Gerrie Schipske through this site on any matter pertaining to the City of Long Beach, a copy of your contact will be forwarded to her official city email as an official public record.
Save Station 18
Popular Posts
-
Two very wrong proposals were placed on the agenda that spend money we really don't have and to give authority to the City Manager to sp...
-
For the first time in the history of California, politicians of either major party will NOT be having influence on how the boundary lines ar...
-
I am sure you agree that Long Beach needs jobs! That's why I am asking my colleagues on the City Council to approve two measures I hav...
-
Hot off the City Council Agenda -- the item proposing reducing the number of council meetings to two a month has been withdrawn.... now the ...
-
Bicycle rush hour in Copenhagen, where 37% of the population ride their bikes each day. (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) Dear Reader, As...
-
Prior to the construction of a 150-acre airport in 1923, pilots could be seen taking off and landing on the long strand of beach or on a san...
-
I will have to pull the video on the debate. I could swear that we were told during the discussion that stores such as Target, Walmart and K...
-
A judge has ruled in San Diego that the City must undergo an environmental impact study before it allows fireworks to be discharged into the...
-
Below is the city management memo and list of retail stores in Long Beach that will not be able to use plastic bags. Things that were not di...
-
Councilwoman Schipske forwarded your email to me for a response regarding the 2011 Long Beach Gas and Oil (LBGO) calendar. I can understand ...