Notice: This is not a City of Long Beach site.
Dear Readers: Please note that this is not a City of Long Beach website and is not paid for nor maintained by taxpayer funds.
If you contact Gerrie Schipske through this site on any matter pertaining to the City of Long Beach, a copy of your contact will be forwarded to her official city email as an official public record.
Monday, February 20, 2012
What the City Might Owe
As you recall, I have opposed the City becoming the successor agency for the closed Redevelopment Agency because of the liability incurred by taking this responsibility. The Council as you further recall was not given a decision in open session on whether or not to become the successor agency because a vote was not scheduled in time to meet the state deadline. So now, Long Beach becomes liable for the "enforceable obligations" outlined in the following report. (See first paragraph of the city document that points out this fact.) This is one of the main reasons the Mayor of Los Angeles urged their City Council not to become the successor agency for Los Angeles' Redevelopment. (See this link to read his letter: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/11/las-community-redevelopment-agency_n_1200174.html)
Additionally, because the city has used redevelopment funds to pay for citywide code enforcement and graffiti removal to the tune of $6 million we must now run the risk of spending this money as the successor agency on these services and having the newly established "Oversight Board" tell us it is an impermissible use of these funds and then the City will have to refund the money and take it out of General Funds.
With another announced deficit for next fiscal year for the City of Long Beach, this was not the time to take on additional financial obligations.
Redevelopment 001
Save Station 18
Popular Posts
-
The Beachcomber news asked its readers to vote for the "Best" in many categories. I have just learned that with 4,000 votes ca...
-
Friday Newsletter Final
-
On Tuesday, December 3, the Long Beach City Council on a 7-1 vote (Schipske voting “no”) approved spending over $1 million to hire a consu...
-
Angel with mobile phone (Photo credit: Akbar Sim ) The City Council again was asked to decide whether or not a cellphone tower could be ...
-
I am receiving emails from constituents who are concerned they are noticing more and more medical marijuana collectives popping up like weed...
-
Friday Newsletter Final
-
The following was given to the LA Times regarding the compensation given to City Council members and the Mayor: Council Compensation 8...
-
Long Beach again makes the news because of yet another killing of a young person. This time on the east side of the city. And the finger poi...
-
When I return to Long Beach (from far away San Diego), I will put the finishing touches on two agenda items that I would like see placed bef...
-
Click on the link and type in your address to find out your new congressional, assembly and state senate district drawn by the Citizens Red...
